Call of Duty VS Battlefield

Call of Duty VS Battlefield


View Comments (47)
  1. they both are good in my opinion as a BFV player.
    My dad who doesn't like cod and played BF for 20 years says cod is for little girls (bruh)

  2. Characters: Call of duty

    Stages: Call of duty

    Game modes: Call of duty

    Weapons: Call of duty.

    Voices: battlefield

    Experience: battlefield

    Winner: Call of duty

  3. I first plaued call.of duty in 2003 and man that game was ahead of its time i was a kid and it flet like i was in a world war. No war game comes close to call of dutys in story modes the game is just too good expecally the old world war games.. and also in battleroyale warzone 1 on vederansk was the best br game ever..
    But in multiplayer no call of duty game can compete with battlefild 1 that game was and is still a masterpiece best multiplayer war game ever in my opinion still havent seen any game that can top battlefield 1 on mp

  4. I don’t think any Call of Duty is better than the best Battlefield games but the latest Modern Warfare games have been better than the latest Battlefield games. Especially MWII vs 2042.

  5. Realistic battlefield for me their equal as well but in battlefield you have a longer time to level up and stuff cause it takes like 4 years for them to make one each so you get time more time to level your guy up too bad they make call of duty s every year just about otherwise it would be easier to get camos

  6. battle field had the upper hand in most ppl's hearts, including cod fans during the infinite warfare – mw1 arc. but with the release of mw2, and now the soon to be released mw3, cod gona be unstoppable/ battlefield got nothing on it

コメントを残す